Thursday, March 2, 2017

MUNWAR RANA YOUR VIEWS ARE SHOCKING

MUNAWAR RANA'S 

SHOCKING POLITICAL VIEW IN PUBLIC DEBATE


Absolute Shocking and outrageous 

It was shocking to listen to Urdu poet Munawar Rana, who is known for returning his Sahitya Academy Award to show his solidarity with other writers on so-called "Growing intolerance" in the country since Narendra Modi became Prime minister. 

He said in a TV debate... THE Nation is going through a very bad phase, where Muslims are under the threat by the present regime in power about their own future in this country.

HE SAID THIS IN ZEE NEWS "TAAL THOK KE DEBATE" YESTERDAY AND IT SHOCKED ME.

So called intellectuals like him and Javed Akhtar who think they are so highly educated that their views on all the issues are the " Only Truth" and nothing but the Truth.

Mr. Munawar Rana...

You said this in response to Rohit Saldhana, the Anchor of the ZEE program "Taal Thok Ke" when he asked your views on Javed Akhtar's Tweet which said...Body builders, Boxers, Pehelwaans, do not qualify themselves to express their views as they all are not very educated and intelligent.

Mr. Rana,...


And You said, to participate in any debate, a person should have enough intelligence to analyze the issue in proper perspective.

A --- You ought to feel embarrassed to provide cover to Javed Akhtar and for unfairly trying to justify his "insulting Tweet" about all our Sports personalities who are Award winners in their respective sports fields and this nation feels proud of them.

B -- You ought o feel ashamed when you say "Indian Muslim's future is threatened in this country because of BJP in power ???

Let me refresh your memory... It was BJP who made our most loved most respected, most admired Space Scientist, APJ Kalam, President of India. That was Atal Bihari Bajpai who took pride in offering Late Abdul Kalam the position of the President of India.

And it was Sonia Gandhi for your information who you love to admire most and write in her praise the Urdu poetry, did not approve his second term as President. We know, Congress is your political choice, even if Congress looted this country and people like you when tax payers money was pocketed in crores in all the scams, YOU shamelessly patronized Congress, stood in its support.

How do you make such outrageous accusation on behalf of all Muslims that they feel insecured about their future in India under PM Modi??

Salman Khan, his father Saleem Khan, Shahrukh Khan, Amir Khan, A.R.Rehman, Javed Akhtar, Assuddin Owaisi, (MP) Nassuriddin Shah, industrialist Azim Premji and the list is unending who are holding top positions irrespective of their being Muslim in this very India.

And what about You ? Have you not been honored in Hindustan with awards? Are you not enjoying the respectable position in this country?

Why don't you as a writer talk about the pathetic condition of Hindus in Pakistan and Bangladesh? Do you have the courage to talk about the systematic genocide of Hindus in Pakistan and Bangladesh?

WE KNOW, YOU AND JAVED AKHTAR WILL NOT TALK ABOUT WHAT IS HAPPENING IN KAIRANA, MALDA, PURNIA WHICH ARE PARTS OF INDIA WHERE HINDU MINORITY IS DRIVEN OUT FROM THEIR HOMES, BEATEN, KILLED, WOMEN RAPED.

YOU WILL NOT TALK FOR KASHMIRI PANDITS OR SIKH COMMUNITY WHO FACED UGLY RIOTS AND WERE KILLED, BURNED, RAPED.

YOU ALL, SO CALLED CHAMPIONS OF "FREEDOM OF SPEECH" ARE QUIET WHEN HINDUS ARE TARGETED IN INDIA BUT OPEN YOUR MOUTHS WHEN SOMEONE THROWS A STONE ON THE CHURCH OR MOSQUE?

THAT IS YOUR SELECTIVE DEFINITION OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND SECULARISM.

ENOUGH OF YOUR INSULTING OUR INTELLIGENCE.

NOW HENCEFORTH YOU ALL WILL BE ANSWERED IN THE MANNER YOU PLAY YOUR POLITICS. REMEBER THIS.


Ajay Angre
Author, Writer, Publisher

Saturday, December 26, 2015

Narendra Modi making joke of diplomacy: Congress on PM's surprise visit to Pakistan

WHO REALLY PLAYED A CRUEL JOKE 
ON PEOPLE OF INDIA??


                                                  CONGRESS MADE A JOKE 
OF THIS COUNTRY 
FOR 60 LONG YEARS...   










WE HAVE BEEN TOLERANT OF YOUR CRUEL JOKE YOU PLAYED ON POOR PEOPLE FOR 60 YEARS BY YOUR FAKE SLOGANEERING, PROMISES AND FAKE AGENDA.

WE STILL DONT HAVE DRINKING WATER, 24X7 POWER, GOOD HEALTH FACILITIES, GOOD SCHOOLS, GOOD ROADS, FARMERS DONT HAVE WATER FOR FARMING ARE DEPENDING ON MONSOON, BECAUSE YOUR MINISTER LOOTED 72000 CRORES IRRIGATION FUNDS.

PAKISTAN WAS BEHEADING OUR SOLDIERS, CROSS BORDER TERRORISM WAS GOING ON. 26/11 MUMBAI TERROR ATTACKS TOOK PLACE DURING YOUR RULE. MANY SERIAL BOMB BLASTS KILLED CIVILIANS. 

HOW DID YOUR GREAT DIPLOMACY IMPROVED RELATIONS BETWEEN PAKISTAN AND INDIA? WHAT GREAT DID YOUR DIPLOMACY ACHIEVED THAT YOU ALL ARE BRAGGING ABOUT? 

WHO ARE YOU FOOLING AGAIN? THE PEOPLE OF THIS COUNTRY?

YOUR FORMER FOREIGN MINISTER SALMAN KHURSHID GOES TO PAKISTAN AND PRAISES NAWAZ SHERIF, PARVEZ MUSHARAF AND YOUR SENIOR CONGRESS LEADER MANI SHANKAR AIYAR  SHARES DIAS WITH PARVEZ MUSHARAF, TELLS PAKISTANI LEADERS THAT YOU NEED TO DO SOMETHING TO THROW MODI FROM POWER AND BRING BACK CONGRESS IN POWER?

WHAT WAS THAT DIPLOMACY MR MANISH TIWARI ?? WHERE YOU HIRING PAKISTANI AGENT TO DESTABILIZE MODI GOVERNMENT? 

YOU ALL ARE ENGAGED WITH PAKISTAN ESTABLISHMENT, ISI, AND PARVEZ MUSHARAF, WHO CALLS HAFIZ SAEED AND LAQVI THEIR HEROES WHO ARE BLEEDING INDIA AND WHO WERE MASTER MINDS OF 26/11 MUMBAI ATTACK.

NOW TELL THE NATION.... MR TIWARI, 
WHO IS PLAYING A CRUEL JOKE WITH INDIA ? 

MR MODI OR CONGRESS? DO YOU TAKE US FOR FOOLS?

AND CONGRESS PRESIDENT OR VICE PRESIDENT TILL TODAY HAVE NOT SACKED BOTH OR  DID NOT EVEN TAKE STRONGEST ACTION AGAINST SALMAN KHURSHID AND MANI SHANKAR AIYAR FOR SUCH A TREACHEROUS ACT ??

SO WHO IS JOKING WITH WHOM ? 

Ajay Angre
Author, Writer, Publisher  

Thursday, December 24, 2015

Who is Democratic- Sonia or PM Modi

Democratic' Sonia Vs 'Dictatorial' Modi

By S Gurumurthy,
New Indian Express,10th December 2015

The Congress party characterizes Modi as a dictator and by implication, presents Sonia as a democrat. Whether a popular leader is a dictator or a democrat is tested by conduct. An unpopular dictator is an oxymoron. A dictator may become unpopular but no unpopular person can ever become a dictator. How a leader behaves when in position of power — particularly when his or her position is under threat — offers the most reliable test.


A popular Indira Gandhi was tested twice. Once in 1969 when her senior colleagues dissented her individualistic style. She used State power, back-stabbed the party and defeated the party nominee in the election for the President of India and captured the party with the help of the enemies of the party by forging an ideological alliance with them. This destroyed the democratic Congress party as the nation knew till then. She put the party under her virtual dictatorship. She changed the very paradigm of national politics from politics of ethics and character to politics of power and success. This brought out her dictatorial mind.
The real dictator in her came out when the Allahabad High Court unseated her from Parliament and the Supreme Court made her a Prime Minister without voting rights in Parliament. She struck at the nation, imposed Emergency and, as Nani Palkhiwala said, defaced and defiled the Constitution, courts, Parliament, Opposition, media, and the people at large and put the whole nation under total dictatorship. It is 40 years since and still now, no one in the Congress or from the family of Indira Gandhi has sincerely regretted the Emergency. On the contrary, Rajiv Gandhi, after he got four-fifths majority in the Lok Sabha in 1984, even tried to justify the Emergency.
And that Congress party and Sonia Gandhi, claiming to be the proud daughter-in-law of Indira Gandhi, are trying to brand Narendra Modi as dictatorial — by implication, claiming to be democratic. Is it not time then that one compared the democratic credentials of Sonia and Modi?
Look at how the ‘dictatorial’ Narendra Modi conducted himself when, just three years before he became the Prime Minister, he was under tremendous pressure from the Opposition, media and even the courts. Sonia Gandhi and her party had accused him of being the merchant of death. The UPA, which had made the CBI its Alsatian, used the agency to target him in the Sohrabuddin case. The sordid story was exposed by The New Indian Express (see articles titled, Fixing Shah, by Fabrication, CBI Betrays Court, Bails Out Congress and Interrogating The Media — published in August 2010). The media was applauding every effort to fix and get rid of him. Yet, there was no FIR against him. No complaint had been filed in any court against him. No court had issued him summons. No court had ordered his examination by police. But the Special Investigation Team (SIT) on Gujarat riots summoned him for examination like police would summon any one at their discretion.
Modi was as popular in Gujarat as he is now all over the country. He was a powerful and performing Chief Minister of Gujarat. Also he was seen as the rising national leader within the BJP when the SIT summoned him. But he did not use his party to drum up support for him in the Assembly nor did his party stall Parliament. The Gujarat Assembly functioned and so did Parliament. He could have gathered a million people to give him a great ovation when he went to the SIT office to put pressure on the investigation and on the instigators of the case against him. He respected the summons and drove to the SIT office in his car. He walked down the lane leading to the SIT alone. He was grilled by the SIT for over eight hours. He answered their questions. Satisfied with his answers, the SIT finally exonerated him.
But his adversaries would not leave him. They charged the SIT with favouring him. Finally, the Supreme Court had to exonerate him twice — once, when the UPA was in power and next time, a few months ago. This is ‘dictatorial’ Modi’s behaviour.
Now compare how the ‘democratic’ Sonia behaved after the National Herald case caught up with her, her son and her family loyalists. Here is the National Herald case in brief. In November 2012, Dr Subramanian Swamy exposed how Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi have grabbed properties of National Herald worth thousands of crores through a convoluted criminal strategy. After that, this newspaper carried a detailed article, National Herald Affair: It’s Fraud All The Way (TNIE, November 8, 2012), explaining the fraud. In January 2013, Dr Swamy filed a criminal complaint against Sonia, her son and family loyalists, including Motilal Vohra, the Congress party treasurer, charging them with conspiracy, fraud, cheating, and criminal breach of trust to rob the shareholders and the public of thousands of crores.
All this happened when the UPA was in power. Rahul Gandhi threatened to file a defamation suit against Dr Swamy. Swamy challenged him but Rahul ran away. In June 2014, a Delhi criminal court took cognisance of the offence and issued summons. Forthwith, Sonia Gandhi and other five accused, including Rahul, filed petitions in the Delhi High Court to quash the criminal proceedings. They kept delaying the hearing till they thought they got the judge they felt comfortable with.
One judge recused himself and so did the next. The matter went to the third judge, who Sonia and her co-accused did not like, and he too recused himself. All the accused petitioned to have the matter heard by the second judge who had recused himself earlier. The case was posted before the very judge, who Sonia and her co-accused felt comfortable with. It is that very same judge, who decided on December 7, 2015 that the lower court has rightly ordered their trial and summoned them, and asked them to appear before the metropolitan magistrate.
Still, hell broke loose. The very next day the Congress president was seen instigating her MPs to stall Parliament. When the Speaker asked them why were they disturbing the House, they shouted they saw in the National Herald case “political vendetta” and “democracy in danger”. When the Speaker asked them to spell out what they want and offered to allow them to raise the issue and speak in the House, they ran away from speaking in the House. Obviously, they only had instructions to stall the House. The same theatrics were repeated in the Rajya Sabha. Not that they did not talk in the House. They couldn’t. Why?
It needs no seer to say that the prosecution on the National Herald fraud was an act of the judiciary and the Modi government had had nothing to do with it. There was no CBI or Income Tax or the Enforcement Directorate in the picture which could link the prosecution to the government. It was the private complaint of Dr Subramanian Swamy on which the magistrate held that Sonia, Rahul and the four family loyalists had created a trust company fully controlled by them as a cloak or sham of a special purpose vehicle to convert public money and to acquire control over thousands of crores of assets of National Herald.
The court held that the accused acted as a consortium to achieve the nefarious purpose and asked them to face trial. This was the prima facie assessment of the court under the law. The government had no role in this process at all. It was between Sonia Gandhi and her co-conspirators on the one hand and Dr Subramanian Swamy on the other, with the court playing the neutral and judicial role.
This order was passed in June 2014. Did Sonia or Rahul or any of the accused or the Congress party even hint that the magistrate had acted outside the law? Stop Parliament? In contrast, they all went to the Delhi High Court to quash the order and summons of the magistrate. The judge, whom they were comfortable with, decided on December 7 that they better face the criminal case as the magistrate had rightly decided.
The very next day, the ‘democratic Sonia’ ordered her party to stall Parliament. Even as she was overseeing the closure of Parliament for the day on December 8 and her son was on a flying visit to Tamil Nadu to offer relief to the flood-affected people, their lawyers were standing before the magistrate and pleading that Sonia, Rahul and the other accused were “keen to appear before the court”. Where is vendetta then, Madam Sonia? The court has granted them 10 days and directed them to appear on December 19. It remains to be seen whether the ‘democratic’ Sonia and Rahul will walk alone and appear before the court like Modi did before the police or gather a huge crowd for theatrics and disturb the court like the Gandhis disturbed the Shah Commission.
A caveat: Obviously stressed by the court notice on charges of swallowing thousands of crores of properties of National Herald by using the Congress party, Sonia Gandhi said, “Why should I be scared of anyone? I am Indira Gandhi’s daughter-in-law.” She said this after personally directing the Congress party to halt Parliament on Tuesday. This is ‘democratic’ Sonia, the daughter-in-law of Indira Gandhi, the saviour of democracy in India, charging Modi with ‘dictatorship’. There cannot be a more cruel joke on democracy.
The author is a well- known commentator on political and economic issues.

Indian Politics of Confrontation and Dishonesty

DO WE SEE ANARCHY IN POLITICS TODAY?

It certainly is self serving politics being played which is dangerously at its lowest in form and expression. India is a target of some unknown powers which are using some people who are orchestrating politics of confrontation only to serve their own political goals.
Suddenly... 70,80 90 year old leaders have become active in politics and trying to hit back at the ruling BJP Team led by PM Modi.
This is in every way बगावत की राजनीती by none other than the seniors in BJP and it is led by none other than LK Advani, MM Joshi, Yashwant Sinha like seniors who ideally speaking should have retired voluntarily and created space for the young leaders in the party and set an example for young generation that politics is not for self serving goals but to serve the nation selflessly without greed for power.
BUT WHAT YOU SEE FROM THE NEW DEVELOPMENT IN POLITICS IS ONLY PROVING, THE GREED FOR POWER IS OVER TOP THAN THE PARTY INTERESTS AND THE COUNTRY.
Everyone of them from LK Advani to MM Joshi are involved in setting up mines in the land where they themselves are standing, and enjoying the Victory of BJP coming back to power with huge mandate in 2014 Lok Sabha Elections??
Was anyone of them responsible remotely to get such a huge electoral mandate for BJP alone?
Only one person with his vision and political approach convinced the electorate to vote BJP in power with majority and that was Narendra Damodardas Modi.... nobody else.


His dynamic leadership, his energy in mobilizing masses from every corner of the country fueled the electoral victory is a well known recorded history. All these old leaders like LK Advani, MM Joshi, Yashwant Sinha, had failed in 2004 and 2009 national elections which were led by solely and solely L.K.Advani and he and his outdated political vision, ideas and approach could not bring victory for BJP and BJP suffered humiliating defeat both times and Congress came to power defeating BJP both times.
WHAT ARE THESE DISGRUNTLED BJP OLD BRIGADE TRYING TO PROVE BY SABOTAGING 2014 VICTORY WHO HAD NO PHYSICAL AND MENTAL ENERGY NOR THE VISION TO WIN ELECTIONS???
WHATEVER THESE GREEDY LEADERS ARE DOING TODAY IS AGAINST THE PARTY´S AND COUNTRY´S INTEREST. IT IS SHAMEFUL TOO.
ALL THOSE DESTRUCTIVE POWERS LIKE ISI OF PAKISTAN, CHINA, AND SOME FOREIGN COUNTRIES AND POWERS WITHIN THE COUNTRY LIKE CONGRESS WHO ARE PLAYING POLITICS TO DESTABILIZE INDIA IN THEIR OWN POLITICAL INTERESTS ARE SUCCEEDING IN THEIR EFFORTS TO DERAIL MODI GOVERNMENT.
TODAY, CONGRESS ,AND ALL OPPOSITION PARTIES ARE GIVEN GOLDEN POLITICAL OPPORTUNITY BY LK ADVANI, MM JHOSHI, YASHWANT SINHA, LIKE SENIORS AND SHATRUGHNA SINHA, KIRTI AZAD LIKE BJP MEMBERS TO HIT OUT AT MODI GOVERNMENT AND BJP AT THE CENTER.
ये बगावत ही है और BJP के इन वरिष्ठ लोगोंने ये गंभीर गुन्हा सिर्फ और सिर्फ और सिर्फ अपने राजकीय मतलब साधने में जुटे है. इन्का दर्द सिर्फ नरेन्द्र मोदी है.
लेकिन ये बात अभी साफ़ है... पार्टी को सीधा बीचमेसे उखाड़ने का और नरेन्द्र मोदी को सीधे निशानेपे लेनेका LK Advani, MM Joshi, Yashwant Sinha जैसे स्वार्थी बुजुर्ग राजनेता उनके गंदी साजीश में काफी हद तक कामयाब होगए है.

ये दुर्भाग्य की बात है की ये देश को स्वार्थी राजकारणी लोगोंने सिर्फ लूटा नहीं लेकिन इस देश की ऐसी हालात की है की ये Gang Rape ही है.

Ajay Angre
Author, Writer, Publisher

Finally Civil Society Won

FINALLY PRESSURE BY CITIZENS 
COMPELLED LAWMAKERS 
TO OWN THEIR RESPONSIBILITY AND PASS
 JUVENILE JUSTICE ACT.

This Juvenile Justice Act passed yesterday by the Rajaj Sabha members after full Dramatics was not a willfully passed spontaneous act by some opposition parties who were again planning to junk it with the select committee.
We must know who are all these political leaders who have been playing their politics over this Juvenile justice Act.
Congress had started on the negative note when the discussion started and also was of the view to let the act be thoroughly studied by the Select committee and not to let it get passed by the house in Hurry Barry.
In hurry Barry ??? What the hell are the leaders of Congress, CPI-:M, JDU, BSP are talking ? Three years none of them had even thought of this important ACT which needed to be introduced urgently. But all these political leaders were busy fighting in self serving politics.
WHO CARED ALL THESE THREE YEARS?
THE CITIZENS OF THIS COUNTRY WERE VERY UPSET. IN UTTER DISGUST WHEN NIRBHAYA´S CRUEL RAPIST WAS RELEASED TO WALK FREE, NIRBHAYA´S PARENTS CAME OUT IN PROTEST DEMANDING THIS BILL TO BE PASSED IMMEDIATELY WITHOUT ANY DRAMA BY POLITICIANS WHO CARED LESS FOR SENTIMENTS OF THE CITIZENS.
YESTERDAY... NIRBHAYA´S PARENTS WERE RIGHT THERE SITTING THE THE RAJA SABHA AND WATCHING THE MEMBERS DEBATING JUVENILE JUSTICE ACT... THEIR PRESENCE FORCED RS MEMBERS TO DISPLAY THEIR RESPONSIBILITY AND SERIOUSNESS ABOUT THE ACT BUT STILL, SOME SHAMELESS MEMBERS WERE SEEN MAKING ABSURD OBSERVATIONS AND NOT IN FAVOR OF PASSING THE BILL.
CPI-M MEMBERS WALKED OUT IN PROTEST. TMC JDU WANTED BILL TO GO TO SELECT COMMITTEE AGAIN.
BUT THE TREMENDOUS PRESSURE BUILT BY CITIZENS FROM OUTSIDE AND FROM SOCIAL MEDIA WAS SO MUCH, RAJA SABHA MEMBERS WERE FORCED TO PASS THE BILL IN UNANIMITY AND HAD NO CHOICE.
THIS I CONSIDER IS A VICTORY OF PEOPLE OF THIS COUNTRY WHO HAVE NOW STARTED TELLING THEIR LAW MAKERS... ENOUGH OF FOOLING...
GET DOWN TO BUSINESS OR YOU WILL FACE US ON THE STREETS AND IT WOULD MEAN DIFFICULT LIFE FOR YOU ALL.
I THINK... NIRBHAYA´S MOTHER PLAYED A BOLD ROLE IN PUTTING PRESSURE ON THE GOVERNMENT AND THE YOUTH OF THIS COUNTRY STOOD FIRMLY WITH HER.
YES... FINALLY NIRBHAYA´S MOTHER AND FATHER DID NOT GET FULL JUSTICE IS TRUE... BUT THEY FORCED TO PARLIAMENTARIANS TO BE MORE RESPONSIBLE AND PASS THE ACT WITHOUT ANY FURTHER DELAY.
OPPOSITION PARTIES GOT EXPOSED WITH THEIR POLITICS BUT CITIZENS HAVE WON.
Ajay Angre
Author, Writer, Publisher